Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:10:21PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 10 September 2014 01:26 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Vivek Gautam
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 01:26 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:09:57AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gauta
Hi,
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:52 AM, "Julius Werner"
wrote
right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
;-)
so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
s
>> right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
>> add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
>> ;-)
> so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
> so that ->calibrate() is not required at all ?
I'm not sure if tha
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:09:57AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gautam
>>> wrote:
>>> > adding Julius here,
>>>
>>> i think i had missed addi
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:09:57AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gautam
>> wrote:
>> > adding Julius here,
>>
>> i think i had missed adding Julius for this entire series :-(
>> I should be more carefu
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:09:57AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
> > adding Julius here,
>
> i think i had missed adding Julius for this entire series :-(
> I should be more careful with the CC list in future.
> Added his chromium id, since t
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> adding Julius here,
i think i had missed adding Julius for this entire series :-(
I should be more careful with the CC list in future.
Added his chromium id, since that seems to be more active.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Ba
adding Julius here,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:19:50AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> On F
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:19:50AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
>> >> >
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
> >> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
> >> >
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
>> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
>> > phy_power_on() ?
>>
>> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
> > phy_power_on() ?
>
> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings in phy_power_on()
> doesn't help, since we need to do this a
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:59:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> Adding phy calibrate callback, which facilitates setting certain
>> >> PHY settings post initializati
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:59:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> Adding phy calibrate callback, which facilitates setting certain
> >> PHY settings post initialization of the PHY controller.
> >> Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 have
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Adding phy calibrate callback, which facilitates setting certain
>> PHY settings post initialization of the PHY controller.
>> Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 have
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding phy calibrate callback, which facilitates setting certain
> PHY settings post initialization of the PHY controller.
> Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 have 28nm USB 3.0 DRD PHY for which
> the Loss-of-Signal (LOS) Detector Thresho
Adding phy calibrate callback, which facilitates setting certain
PHY settings post initialization of the PHY controller.
Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 have 28nm USB 3.0 DRD PHY for which
the Loss-of-Signal (LOS) Detector Threshold Level as well as
Tx-Vboost-Level should be controlled for Super-Speed op
19 matches
Mail list logo
