On 6/25/2020 8:55 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > Wait, so *some* of
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm not really reading any of this stuff for the series as a whole, as
> > far as I could tell I'd reviewed all my bits and was hoping whatever
> > random platform
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits?
> > > But you want them
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits?
> > But you want them split up for some reason?
> Yes, this will almost certainly be the case,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:39:48AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:15:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Aren't there dependencies on earlier patches in the series?
>
> > Not to my knowledge. Patch
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:39:48AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:15:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Aren't there dependencies on earlier patches in the series?
> Not to my knowledge. Patch "[2/6] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use OPP API to set
> clk/perf state" depends on
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:15:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:09:33AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > do you plan to land this in your tree?
> >
> > I know you hate contentless pings, but since you acked this patch and
> > usually don't seem to do
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:09:33AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> do you plan to land this in your tree?
>
> I know you hate contentless pings, but since you acked this patch and
> usually don't seem to do that when patches go through your tree I want
> to make sure we aren't in
Hi Mark,
do you plan to land this in your tree?
I know you hate contentless pings, but since you acked this patch and
usually don't seem to do that when patches go through your tree I want
to make sure we aren't in a situation where everybody thinks that the
patch will go through someone else's
QSPI needs to vote on a performance state of a power domain depending on
the clock rate. Add support for it by specifying the perf state/clock rate
as an OPP table in device tree.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
Acked-by: Mark Brown
Cc: Alok Chauhan
Cc: Akash
11 matches
Mail list logo
