Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 02 July 2014 08:33:47 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> For now it is -ENOTIME for me. It's on my TODO list, but there are a number
> of other things I want to finish first.
No worries, I know how it feels. I just wanted to make sure you hadn't missed
my e-mail.
--
Regards,
Laurent
For now it is -ENOTIME for me. It's on my TODO list, but there are a number of
other things I want to finish first.
Regards,
Hans
On 07/01/2014 11:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2014 12:58:03 Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Ping?
>
> Hans, I've replied to your previous e-ma
On Wednesday 25 June 2014 12:58:03 Sasha Levin wrote:
> Ping?
Hans, I've replied to your previous e-mail with
I'm of course fine with a different way to solve the race condition, if we can
find a good one. Do you already know how you would like to solve this ?
> On 05/23/2014 09:54 AM, Hans Ver
Ping?
On 05/23/2014 09:54 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> This patch caused a circular locking dependency as reported by Sasha Levin:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/5/366
>
> The reason is that copy_to/from_user is called in video_usercopy() with the
> core lock held. The copy funct
Hi Hans,
On Friday 23 May 2014 15:54:29 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> This patch caused a circular locking dependency as reported by Sasha Levin:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/5/366
>
> The reason is that copy_to/from_user is called in video_usercopy() with the
> core lock held. The
Hi Laurent,
This patch caused a circular locking dependency as reported by Sasha Levin:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/5/366
The reason is that copy_to/from_user is called in video_usercopy() with the
core lock held. The copy functions can fault which takes the mmap_sem. If it
was just video_userc
6 matches
Mail list logo
