On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
> policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
> independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
>
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
> policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
> independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
> native error handlers, a
FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
native error handlers, a number of which will recover the system from
fatal errors.
The
FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
native error handlers, a number of which will recover the system from
fatal errors.
The
4 matches
Mail list logo