Hi Ingo,
On 03/16/2017 03:17 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>
Hi Ingo,
How about this version? Any further comments?
>>> So I
Hi Ingo,
On 03/16/2017 03:17 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>
Hi Ingo,
How about this version? Any further comments?
>>> So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and
* Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Lu Baolu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo,
> >>
> >> How about this version? Any further comments?
> > So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found
* Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Lu Baolu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo,
> >>
> >> How about this version? Any further comments?
> > So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found at least
> > one
> > thing I pointed out that you
Hi Ingo,
On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> How about this version? Any further comments?
> So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found at least one
> thing I pointed out that you didn't address in
Hi Ingo,
On 03/02/2017 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> How about this version? Any further comments?
> So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found at least one
> thing I pointed out that you didn't address in the latest patches ...
Do
* Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> How about this version? Any further comments?
So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found at least one
thing I pointed out that you didn't address in the latest patches ...
Plus please go beyond the feedback
* Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> How about this version? Any further comments?
So I have re-read the review feedback I gave on Jan 19 and found at least one
thing I pointed out that you didn't address in the latest patches ...
Plus please go beyond the feedback given - for example the
Hi Ingo,
How about this version? Any further comments?
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
On 02/14/2017 10:27 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> xHCI debug capability (DbC) is an optional but standalone
> functionality provided by an xHCI host controller. With DbC
> hardware initialized, the system will present a
Hi Ingo,
How about this version? Any further comments?
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
On 02/14/2017 10:27 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> xHCI debug capability (DbC) is an optional but standalone
> functionality provided by an xHCI host controller. With DbC
> hardware initialized, the system will present a
xHCI debug capability (DbC) is an optional but standalone
functionality provided by an xHCI host controller. With DbC
hardware initialized, the system will present a debug device
through the USB3 debug port (normally the first USB3 port).
The debug device is fully compliant with the USB framework
xHCI debug capability (DbC) is an optional but standalone
functionality provided by an xHCI host controller. With DbC
hardware initialized, the system will present a debug device
through the USB3 debug port (normally the first USB3 port).
The debug device is fully compliant with the USB framework
12 matches
Mail list logo