Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-26 Thread Minchan Kim
Seem to lose this from mail bomb. Ping. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:16:26PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. > I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. > > The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of > zsmalloc part while

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-26 Thread Minchan Kim
Seem to lose this from mail bomb. Ping. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:16:26PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of zsmalloc part while Jens,

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-23 Thread Minchan Kim
Howdy Bob, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:10:17PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > >> Hi Minchan, > >> > >> On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> >

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-23 Thread Bob Liu
Hi Minchan, On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: >> Hi Minchan, >> >> On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: >> > It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. >> > I rewrote cover-letter totally based on

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-23 Thread Bob Liu
Hi Minchan, On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote: Hi Bob, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-23 Thread Minchan Kim
Howdy Bob, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:10:17PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote: Hi Bob, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:26:45PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 08/21/2013 05:24 PM, Bob Liu wrote: > > Hi Minchan, > > > > On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. > >> I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. > >> > >> The main

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Bob, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. > > I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. > > > > The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Bob Liu
On 08/21/2013 05:24 PM, Bob Liu wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: >> It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. >> I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. >> >> The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of >> zsmalloc part while

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Bob Liu
Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. > I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. > > The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of > zsmalloc part while Jens, block maintainer, already acked > zram

[PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of zsmalloc part while Jens, block maintainer, already acked zram part. At that time, zsmalloc was used for zram, zcache and zswap so

[PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of zsmalloc part while Jens, block maintainer, already acked zram part. At that time, zsmalloc was used for zram, zcache and zswap so

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Bob Liu
Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of zsmalloc part while Jens, block maintainer, already acked zram part.

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Bob Liu
On 08/21/2013 05:24 PM, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of zsmalloc part while Jens, block

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Bob, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:24:00PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent zram promotion was no review of

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2013-08-21 Thread Minchan Kim
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:26:45PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: On 08/21/2013 05:24 PM, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Minchan, On 08/21/2013 02:16 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: It's 7th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion. I rewrote cover-letter totally based on previous discussion. The main reason to prevent