> On Dec 6, 2018, at 2:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:33:54PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> Which leads me to (b) - the patch-set is big "enough" IMHO. Indeed,
>> there are open security issues in the kernel when it comes to W^X. But
>> some people would want to use An
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:33:54PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Which leads me to (b) - the patch-set is big "enough" IMHO. Indeed,
> there are open security issues in the kernel when it comes to W^X. But
> some people would want to use Andy's temporary mm-struct for other uses.
> So additional secu
This patch-set addresses some issues that might affect the security and
the correctness of code patching. It was originally small and mainly
intended to remove the text-poking fixmap PTEs, which can cause PTEs
cached in the TLB in remote cores for unbounded time.
It was then suggested by tglx and
3 matches
Mail list logo