On 2015年01月28日 01:46, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi
Thanks!
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need to add two patches:
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need to add two patches:
acpi: add arm to the platforms that use ioremap
htt
On 2015年01月16日 18:10, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI
>> attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means
>> "program the same cacheable AXI set
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for
On 01/16/2015 09:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16,
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:29:44 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > Instead, keeping these patches out means that hardware is getting
> > > developed and tested against Fedora, early access RHEL and Linaro
> > > kernels. It means that we're abdicating on any influence mainline has
> > > over how those pla
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:29:22PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Actually, another thing that might help would be if you and/or Will were
> > to prod the relevant people for review, letting them know that the
> > controversy isn't likel
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +
, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
> >
> > I'll get right to the p
On 1/16/15 09:17, Al Stone wrote:
On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote:
>
> The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI
> attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means
> "program the same cacheable AXI settings as you have on the CPU". That
> sounds like Linux shou
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:40:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendac
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > > drivers that I'm about to submit u
Hi Will,
On 01/16/2015 08:55 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
on the AMD Seattle server platform. T
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > > drivers that I'm about to submit u
On 01/16/2015 08:17 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3
On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> This is the v
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
> > on the AMD Seattle se
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
> on the AMD Seattle server platform. There does not appear to be support
> for the _CCA
On 01/16/2015 01:17 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo
wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right t
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
> > slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
> > patch via get_maintai
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
> slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
> patch via get_maintainer.pl and adds the corresponding Cc: lines to the
> commit log. I thi
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:51:39PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Just changing the subject lines to be more suitable would help, but
> > given the painful thread it's probably worth going the extra step if
> > the lack of these reviews
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > > > I'll get right to the poi
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:17:56AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
On 2015年01月16日 04:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and apparently controversial t
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series
On 01/15/2015 04:31 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>>>
>>> I'll get rig
On 1/14/2015 9:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
updates from v6:
- Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
- Two patches about converting api
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>>
>> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> > > being posted as part of
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> > being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
> > subject lines in th
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> > > for v3.20?
>
> > Bef
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> > for v3.20?
> Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
> that t
On 01/14/2015 10:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>
> updates from v6:
> - Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
> the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
>
> - Two patches about
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>
> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> for v3.20?
Before you even
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Hi Catalin and Will,
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20? I really think we've hit the point where it is more
valuable to merge
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
updates from v6:
- Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
- Two patches about converting apic_id to phys_id to make it arch
agnostic
41 matches
Mail list logo
