It was pointed out in a review, and checkpatch.pl complains about this.
Breaking it down into multiple ofw evaluations works just as well and
reads better.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

---
Changes since v6:
- s/perhaps even reads better/reads better/ in the commit message
- Collect ack from Thomas Gleixner
- Fix the subject prefix to "x86/platform/olpc:"

Changes since v5:
- This patch was split off from "x86, olpc: Use a correct version when
  making up a battery node"

 arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
index ac9e7bf49b66..87e1d81684c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
@@ -242,9 +242,9 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
        pr_info("PROM DT: Old firmware detected, applying fixes\n");
 
        /* Add olpc,xo1-battery compatible marker to battery node */
-       olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device"
-               " \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible"
-               " device-end");
+       olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device");
+       olpc_dt_interpret("  \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible");
+       olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
 
        board_rev = olpc_dt_get_board_revision();
        if (!board_rev)
@@ -252,19 +252,24 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
 
        if (board_rev >= olpc_board_pre(0xd0)) {
                /* XO-1.5: add dcon device */
-               olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device"
-                       " new-device"
-                       " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
-                       " finish-device device-end");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("  new-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("    \" dcon\" device-name");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("    \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("  finish-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
        } else {
                /* XO-1: add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc */
-               olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device"
-                       " new-device"
-                       " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
-                       " finish-device device-end"
-                       " \" /rtc\" find-device"
-                       " \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible"
-                       " device-end");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("  new-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("    \" dcon\" device-name");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("    \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("  finish-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
+
+               olpc_dt_interpret("\" /rtc\" find-device");
+               olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible");
+               olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to