On 03/08/2016 08:58 PM, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 02:01 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2016 01:35 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
error handling:
When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status f
> On 03/08/2016 02:01 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 01:35 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>>> A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
>>> error handling:
>>> When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status for a request,
>>> it will be requeued and its tag will be
> On 03/08/2016 01:35 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
>> error handling:
>> When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status for a request,
>> it will be requeued and its tag will be freed and set to -1.
>> At the same time it is possibl
On 03/08/2016 02:01 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 01:35 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
>> error handling:
>> When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status for a request,
>> it will be requeued and its tag will be freed a
On 03/08/2016 01:35 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
> error handling:
> When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status for a request,
> it will be requeued and its tag will be freed and set to -1.
> At the same time it is possible that
A race condition exists between request requeueing and scsi layer
error handling:
When UFS driver queuecommand returns a busy status for a request,
it will be requeued and its tag will be freed and set to -1.
At the same time it is possible that the request will timeout and
scsi layer will start er
6 matches
Mail list logo
