On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:04:21PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:37 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > Yuck, didn't we talk about this already?
> >
> > I am sorry Borislav. I thought you agreed that I could use the values
> > of
> > the segment override prefixes to identify
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:04:21PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:37 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > Yuck, didn't we talk about this already?
> >
> > I am sorry Borislav. I thought you agreed that I could use the values
> > of
> > the segment override prefixes to identify
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Wouldn't this be ending up mixing the actual segment register and
> segment register overrides? I plan to have a function that parses the
> segment override prefixes and returns SEG_REG_CS/DS/ES/FS/GS or
> SEG_REG_IGNORE for long mode
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Wouldn't this be ending up mixing the actual segment register and
> segment register overrides? I plan to have a function that parses the
> segment override prefixes and returns SEG_REG_CS/DS/ES/FS/GS or
> SEG_REG_IGNORE for long mode
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:37 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Yuck, didn't we talk about this already?
>
> I am sorry Borislav. I thought you agreed that I could use the values
> of
> the segment override prefixes to identify the segment registers [1].
This time with the reference:
[1].
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:37 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Yuck, didn't we talk about this already?
>
> I am sorry Borislav. I thought you agreed that I could use the values
> of
> the segment override prefixes to identify the segment registers [1].
This time with the reference:
[1].
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 12:35 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> > the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> > the cases, the
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 12:35 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> > the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> > the cases, the
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> the cases, the segment base address will be zero as in USER_DS/USER32_DS.
> However,
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> the cases, the segment base address will be zero as in USER_DS/USER32_DS.
> However,
When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
the cases, the segment base address will be zero as in USER_DS/USER32_DS.
However, it may be possible that a user space program defines its own
segments
When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
the cases, the segment base address will be zero as in USER_DS/USER32_DS.
However, it may be possible that a user space program defines its own
segments
12 matches
Mail list logo
