On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:27 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:07 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > Nick, the patch set is getting simpler and simpler,
> > and almost good enough to be merged.
>
> I agree. I think Sedat pointed out a binutils 2.35.2 release; thanks
> to
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:36 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:06:12AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > GCC never outputs '.file 0', which is why
> > this test is only needed for Clang, correct?
>
> No, GCC outputs .file 0 if it during configure time detected assembler that
>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:06:12AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> GCC never outputs '.file 0', which is why
> this test is only needed for Clang, correct?
No, GCC outputs .file 0 if it during configure time detected assembler that
supports it and doesn't have any of the known bugs related to it.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:07 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Nick, the patch set is getting simpler and simpler,
> and almost good enough to be merged.
I agree. I think Sedat pointed out a binutils 2.35.2 release; thanks
to Nick Clifton for that.
>
>
> Please let me ask two questions below.
>
>
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:44 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
>
> DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
>
> Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
> removed $(AS), so we must query $(CC) for DWARF5 assembler directive
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 1:37 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
> > >
> > > Feature detection of DWARF5 is
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
> >
> > Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
> > removed $(AS), so we must query
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:10 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
> >
> > Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
> > removed $(AS), so we must
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
>
> Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
> removed $(AS), so we must query $(CC) for DWARF5 assembler directive
> support.
>
> The DWARF
DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
removed $(AS), so we must query $(CC) for DWARF5 assembler directive
support.
The DWARF version of a binary can be validated with:
$ llvm-dwarfdump vmlinux | head
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:44:01PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.
>
> Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we've
> removed $(AS), so we must query $(CC) for DWARF5 assembler directive
> support.
>
> The
11 matches
Mail list logo
