On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:32:19 +0100
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:34:04PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
> > Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100,
Hi Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:34:04PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
> Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> > > Cristian
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:51:13 +0100
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> > Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >
> > > Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
> Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> > Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
> > and common devm_get_ops().
> >
> > Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
> > Cc: Jonathan
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
> and common devm_get_ops().
>
> Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
+CC linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Rule of thumb if it
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:48:28 +
Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:12:02PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
>
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:12:02PM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
> >
>
> Can I get official Reviewed-by or Acked-by please if you are
iio/scmi: port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface
Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
and common devm_get_ops().
Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
Cc: Jonathan Cameron
Acked-by: Jyoti Bhayana
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
On
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:38:43PM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
>
Can I get official Reviewed-by or Acked-by please if you are fine with the
change ?
I definitely need one from Jonathan to merge this and one from Jyoti
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Jyoti
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:22 PM Cristian Marussi
wrote:
>
> Hi Jyoti,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Thanks for porting this driver to the new
Hi Jyoti,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for porting this driver to the new interface. I have two questions:
>
> 1) In the following code snippet, can the sensor_ops be made as part
> of struct scmi_iio_priv as scmi_protocol_handle is
Hi Christian,
Thanks for porting this driver to the new interface. I have two questions:
1) In the following code snippet, can the sensor_ops be made as part
of struct scmi_iio_priv as scmi_protocol_handle is also part of that
struct. Not sure if there are any particular reasons for having the
Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
and common devm_get_ops().
Cc: Jyoti Bhayana
Cc: Jonathan Cameron
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi
---
drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c | 91 ++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 50
13 matches
Mail list logo
