Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: bd9576: Add IRQ support

2021-02-10 Thread Vaittinen, Matti
Hello Again Lee & All, On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:01 +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 15:25 +, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > + /* BD9573 only supports fatal IRQs which we do not > > > handle */ > > > > Why not? > > Because

Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: bd9576: Add IRQ support

2021-02-09 Thread Matti Vaittinen
Hello Lee, I appreciate your thorough reviews :) Thanks. On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 15:25 +, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > BD9573 and BD9576 support set of "protection" interrupts for > > "fatal" > > issues. Those lead to SOC reset as PMIC shuts the power

Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: bd9576: Add IRQ support

2021-02-09 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > BD9573 and BD9576 support set of "protection" interrupts for "fatal" > issues. Those lead to SOC reset as PMIC shuts the power outputs. Thus > there is no relevant IRQ handling for them. > > Few "detection" interrupts were added to the BD9576 with

[PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: bd9576: Add IRQ support

2021-01-22 Thread Matti Vaittinen
BD9573 and BD9576 support set of "protection" interrupts for "fatal" issues. Those lead to SOC reset as PMIC shuts the power outputs. Thus there is no relevant IRQ handling for them. Few "detection" interrupts were added to the BD9576 with the idea that SOC could take some recovery-action before