On 07/02/2018 11:11 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:09 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
determining whether to use the TPM chip.
I don't see a need for separating this change from the previous patch.
Could
On 07/02/2018 11:11 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:09 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
determining whether to use the TPM chip.
I don't see a need for separating this change from the previous patch.
Could
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:09 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
> determining whether to use the TPM chip.
I don't see a need for separating this change from the previous patch.
Could you squash this patch with the previous
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:09 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
> determining whether to use the TPM chip.
I don't see a need for separating this change from the previous patch.
Could you squash this patch with the previous
Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
determining whether to use the TPM chip.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h| 1 -
security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 2 +-
security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 7
Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
determining whether to use the TPM chip.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h| 1 -
security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 2 +-
security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 7
6 matches
Mail list logo