Hi Catalin,
On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they
> > can
> > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please
> > speak if my
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can
> be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please
> speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :).
> Otherwise I'm going
Hi Sudeep,
On 17/10/16 17:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/10/16 16:46, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >this is a repost of version 7 of "CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous
> >systems" patchset [1] (please refer to previous postings to get some
> >context).
> >I only added Juno
On 17/10/16 16:46, Juri Lelli wrote:
Hi all,
this is a repost of version 7 of "CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous
systems" patchset [1] (please refer to previous postings to get some context).
I only added Juno r1 dts, as discussed off-line with Sudeep meanwhile (no code
changes at al
Hi all,
this is a repost of version 7 of "CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous
systems" patchset [1] (please refer to previous postings to get some context).
I only added Juno r1 dts, as discussed off-line with Sudeep meanwhile (no code
changes at all, so that's why I'm saying this is a rep
5 matches
Mail list logo
