On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:13 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good plan, I'll take that. Want to respin the
> patches with the code in drivers/staging/ and I'll be glad to queue them
> up after 5.1-rc1 is out.
Andreas Farber suggested that the patchset may have more success reaching
its
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:11:11PM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:13 PM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > That sounds like a good plan, I'll take that. Want to respin the
> > patches with the code in drivers/staging/ and I'll be glad to queue them
> > up after 5.1-rc1 is out.
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:13 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good plan, I'll take that. Want to respin the
> patches with the code in drivers/staging/ and I'll be glad to queue them
> up after 5.1-rc1 is out.
Awesome ! You can expect it in the next few days.
I'll also incorporate the
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:25 PM Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> I have two unfinished drivers that might benefit, for Hilscher netX 52
> (multi-protocol) and Microchip LAN9252 (EtherCAT), as well as a Linux
> port for Infineon XMC4500 that might be expanded to XMC4800 (EtherCAT).
>
> But
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:02:34PM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:14 AM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Well, who wants this code? Who uses it? Find those people and get them
> > to review it. If no one wants it or uses it, that kind of implies that
> > it's not needed :)
>
Am 11.03.19 um 18:02 schrieb Sven Van Asbroeck:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:14 AM Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> Well, who wants this code? Who uses it? Find those people and get them
>> to review it. If no one wants it or uses it, that kind of implies that
>> it's not needed :)
>
> We have customers
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:14 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> Well, who wants this code? Who uses it? Find those people and get them
> to review it. If no one wants it or uses it, that kind of implies that
> it's not needed :)
We have customers who (will) talk to this ABI from userspace, but they are
not
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:05:11AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 7:19 AM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > I would like to see other people review and put their "name" on the
> > patchset either with a "reviewed-by:" or "ack" or something.
>
> That's what I would love to see too
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 7:19 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> I would like to see other people review and put their "name" on the
> patchset either with a "reviewed-by:" or "ack" or something.
That's what I would love to see too !
And I agree with you that a patchset like this needs more review.
Probably a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:47:36AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:12 PM Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> >
> > This patch:
> > 1. adds a Fieldbus subsystem
> > 2. adds support for the HMS Industrial Networks AB Profinet card.
> >
>
> Is there any feedback I may
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:12 PM Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
>
> This patch:
> 1. adds a Fieldbus subsystem
> 2. adds support for the HMS Industrial Networks AB Profinet card.
>
Is there any feedback I may address? Any improvements I could make?
Any clarifications?
If not, what would be the
This patch:
1. adds a Fieldbus subsystem
2. adds support for the HMS Industrial Networks AB Profinet card.
1. Fieldbus subsystem
-
Fieldbus device (client) adapters allow data exchange with a PLC aka.
"Fieldbus Controller" over a fieldbus (Profinet, FLNet, etc.)
They are
12 matches
Mail list logo
