Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-24 Thread Atish Patra
On 7/22/19 12:25 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Atish Patra wrote: The cpu-map DT entry in ARM can describe the CPU topology in much better way compared to other existing approaches. RISC-V can easily adopt this binding to represent

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-22 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > > > The cpu-map DT entry in ARM can describe the CPU topology in much better > > way compared to other existing approaches. RISC-V can easily adopt this > > binding to represent its own CPU topology. Thus, both

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-12 Thread Paul Walmsley
Folks, On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > The cpu-map DT entry in ARM can describe the CPU topology in much better > way compared to other existing approaches. RISC-V can easily adopt this > binding to represent its own CPU topology. Thus, both cpu-map DT > binding and topology parsing

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-01 Thread Atish Patra
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:55 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:44 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off- > > > by:. Can I > > > add those? > > > > > Sure. > > > > Is it a

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-01 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:44 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off-by:. Can I > > add those? > > > Sure. > > Is it a common practice to add "Signed-off-by:" the sender even if the > sender has

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-01 Thread Atish Patra
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:44 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Atish > > Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off-by:. Can > I add > those? > Sure. Is it a common practice to add "Signed-off-by:" the sender even if the sender has not touched the patch at all? Regards, Atish

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-07-01 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi Atish Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off-by:. Can I add those? - Paul

[PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V

2019-06-27 Thread Atish Patra
The cpu-map DT entry in ARM can describe the CPU topology in much better way compared to other existing approaches. RISC-V can easily adopt this binding to represent its own CPU topology. Thus, both cpu-map DT binding and topology parsing code can be moved to a common location so that RISC-V or