On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:35:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:35:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:35:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:35:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> > >
On Monday, October 17, 2016 09:30:59 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> > >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> > According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
> >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> > According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
> >
On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
> power sequence instances will be added at postcore_initcall, the match
>
On Friday, October 14, 2016 10:59:47 AM Peter Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
> power sequence instances will be added at postcore_initcall, the match
>
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
power sequence instances will be added at postcore_initcall, the match
criteria is compatible string first, if the compatible string is not
matched
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2]. The kinds of
power sequence instances will be added at postcore_initcall, the match
criteria is compatible string first, if the compatible string is not
matched
12 matches
Mail list logo