Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-23 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:49:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:33:02AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > I personally (and I think this is the general LKML behaviour) use > > in-reply-to > > when I post a single patch that is a fix for a bug, or a small enhancemen

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-23 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:04:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > If you think this is actually the wrong thing, is it worth trying > > to fix the git docs to deprecate this option? > > As said in the other email; git has different standards than lkml. By > now we're just one of many many users

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:31:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > So is your recommendation to avoid the git send-email --in-reply-to > option? If so, would you recommend including an lkml.kernel.org > link in the cover letter pointing to the previous version, or > is there something else that wou

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:33:02AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:31:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > On 10/21/2015 08:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >Can you *please* start a new thread with each posting? > > > > > >This is absolutely unmanageable. > > > > I'

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-22 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:31:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 10/21/2015 08:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >Can you *please* start a new thread with each posting? > > > >This is absolutely unmanageable. > > I've been explicitly threading the multiple patch series on purpose > due to this tex

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-22 Thread Chris Metcalf
On 10/21/2015 08:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: Can you *please* start a new thread with each posting? This is absolutely unmanageable. I've been explicitly threading the multiple patch series on purpose due to this text in "git help send-email": --in-reply-to= Make the fir

Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Can you *please* start a new thread with each posting? This is absolutely unmanageable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

[PATCH v8 00/14] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full

2015-10-20 Thread Chris Metcalf
This email discusses in detail the changes for v8; please see older versions of the cover letter for details about older versions. v8: The biggest difference in this version is, at Thomas Gleixner's suggestion, I removed the code that busy-waits until there are no scheduler-tick timer event