On 12.07.2018 14:13, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 03.07.2018 20:32, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 03.07.2018 20:00, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:17 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
Hi, Shakeel,
On 03.07.2018 18:46, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matt
On 03.07.2018 20:32, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 03.07.2018 20:00, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:17 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Shakeel,
>>>
>>> On 03.07.2018 18:46, Shakeel Butt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 201
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:47:44AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:46:28AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > This will actually reduce the size of each shrinker and be more
> > > cache-efficient when calling the shri
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:25 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:19:35PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:13 PM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > > Do we really have so very many !memcg-aware shrinkers?
> > > >
> > > > $ git grep -w register_shrinker |wc
> > >
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:19:35PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:13 PM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > Do we really have so very many !memcg-aware shrinkers?
> > >
> > > $ git grep -w register_shrinker |wc
> > > 32 1192221
> > > $ git grep -w register_shrinker_prepa
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:13 PM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> On 03.07.2018 20:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:46:57PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> shrinker_idr now contains only memcg-aware shrinkers, so all bits from
> >> memcg map
> >> may be potentially populated. In cas
On 03.07.2018 20:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:46:57PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> shrinker_idr now contains only memcg-aware shrinkers, so all bits from memcg
>> map
>> may be potentially populated. In case of memcg-aware shrinkers and
>> !memcg-aware
>> shrinkers shar
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:46:57PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> shrinker_idr now contains only memcg-aware shrinkers, so all bits from memcg
> map
> may be potentially populated. In case of memcg-aware shrinkers and
> !memcg-aware
> shrinkers share the same numbers like you suggest, this will lea
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:46:28AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > This will actually reduce the size of each shrinker and be more
> > cache-efficient when calling the shrinkers. I think we can also get
> > rid of the shrinker_rwsem eventually
On 03.07.2018 20:00, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:17 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Shakeel,
>>
>> On 03.07.2018 18:46, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> ++
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:17 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> Hi, Shakeel,
>
> On 03.07.2018 18:46, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsi
Hi, Shakeel,
On 03.07.2018 18:46, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
>>> static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
>>>
On 03.07.2018 18:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
>> static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
>> static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>> +
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
> > static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> > static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFI
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
> static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> +static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
> +static int shrin
The patch introduces shrinker::id number, which is used to enumerate
memcg-aware shrinkers. The number start from 0, and the code tries
to maintain it as small as possible.
This will be used as to represent a memcg-aware shrinkers in memcg
shrinkers map.
Since all memcg-aware shrinkers are based
16 matches
Mail list logo