On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:19:14PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> This is a good suggestion. I will work on it. By now my series comprises
> 28 patches. If you plan to review the rest of the series and you don't
> have major objections, could I work on these updates as increments from
> my v8 series?
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 18:09 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:46PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Even though memory addresses are unsigned, the operands used to compute the
> > effective address do have a sign. This is true for ModRM.rm, SIB.base,
> > SIB.index as well
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:46PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Even though memory addresses are unsigned, the operands used to compute the
> effective address do have a sign. This is true for ModRM.rm, SIB.base,
> SIB.index as well as the displacement bytes. Thus, signed variables shall
> be used
Even though memory addresses are unsigned, the operands used to compute the
effective address do have a sign. This is true for ModRM.rm, SIB.base,
SIB.index as well as the displacement bytes. Thus, signed variables shall
be used when computing the effective address from these operands. Once the
sig
4 matches
Mail list logo
