On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Given that Dom0 is not booted via EFI but as zImage, how are we going to
> > pass the two EFI table pointers to Linux? Via Device Tree? It doesn't
> > look like a great improvement to me.
> >
>
> The EFI system table and memory map pointers shall be
On 11 February 2015 at 14:33, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> >> > On
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> > On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> > On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
On 11 February 2015 at 14:33, Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Given that Dom0 is not booted via EFI but as zImage, how are we going to
pass the two EFI table pointers to Linux? Via Device Tree? It doesn't
look like a great improvement to me.
The EFI system table and memory map pointers shall be passed to
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 9 February 2015 at 19:46, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:03:44AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver
On 2015年02月07日 13:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of linux_banner from
build.
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
> [...]
>
>>
>>
>> linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of linux_banner from
>> build.
>>
>>
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of linux_banner from build.
On 2 February 2015 at 16:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> > > When system supporting both DT and ACPI but
On 2015年02月07日 13:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of
On 7 February 2015 at 03:36, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of linux_banner from
build.
On 2015年02月06日 18:34, G Gregory wrote:
[...]
linux,uefi-stub-kern-ver | string | Copy of linux_banner from build.
On 2 February 2015 at 16:32, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
When system supporting both DT and
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
> > > no dtb, we can use this
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
> > no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
> > to let kernel know that we can try
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
> no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
> to let kernel know that we can try ACPI configuration data even
> if no "acpi=force" is passed in early
When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
to let kernel know that we can try ACPI configuration data even
if no "acpi=force" is passed in early parameters.
CC: Mark Rutland
CC: Jonathan Corbet
CC: Catalin
When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
to let kernel know that we can try ACPI configuration data even
if no acpi=force is passed in early parameters.
CC: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
CC: Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
to let kernel know that we can try ACPI configuration data even
if no acpi=force is passed in early
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
no dtb, we can use this linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb property
to let kernel know that we can try ACPI
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
When system supporting both DT and ACPI but firmware providing
no dtb, we can use this
26 matches
Mail list logo
