On 04/13/2015 10:31 PM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-04-13 05:17:01)
On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-04-13 05:17:01)
> On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >>
> >> Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
> >>>
> >>> This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
> >>> that of
On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
>>>
>>> This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
>>> that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will
On 04/13/2015 10:31 PM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-04-13 05:17:01)
On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen mikko.perttu...@kapsi.fi wrote:
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-04-13 05:17:01)
On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen mikko.perttu...@kapsi.fi wrote:
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that
On 11 April 2015 at 13:00, Mikko Perttunen mikko.perttu...@kapsi.fi wrote:
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
On 04/11/2015 12:08 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
> This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
> that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
> have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
> clock rate correctly.
>
> Without this patch,
Quoting Mikko Perttunen (2015-03-01 04:44:33)
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
clock rate correctly.
Without this patch,
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
clock rate correctly.
Without this patch, calling clk_put on CCLK_G could cause the CCF
to set its
This patch moves the initialization of PLL_X to be slightly before
that of CCLK_G. This ensures that at boot, CCLK_G will immediately
have a parent and the common clock framework can determine its
clock rate correctly.
Without this patch, calling clk_put on CCLK_G could cause the CCF
to set its
12 matches
Mail list logo
