On 15-06-12 02:49 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:08:20PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
>> The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
>> clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
>> of the pwm core was wrong.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:08:20PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
> clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
> of the pwm core was wrong. Clearing the bit when enable returns an error
> ensures
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:08:20PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
of the pwm core was wrong. Clearing the bit when enable returns an error
ensures the
On 15-06-12 02:49 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:08:20PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
of the pwm core was wrong. Clearing the
The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
of the pwm core was wrong. Clearing the bit when enable returns an error
ensures the state is properly set.
Tested-by: Jonathan Richardson
Reviewed-by:
The pwm_enable function didn't clear the enabled bit if a call to a
clients enable function returned an error. The result was that the state
of the pwm core was wrong. Clearing the bit when enable returns an error
ensures the state is properly set.
Tested-by: Jonathan Richardson
6 matches
Mail list logo
