On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 06:44:23PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> I am simply asking how was this patchset tested.
> It would be nice to have this info in commit log.
> Since this is an optimization patch it is strange
> to see one with no numbers at all.
> For example, you probably run some
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:40:37AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 03:58 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:24:55AM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> >>Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
> >>the number of 2MB contiguous memory bl
On 08/26/2012 03:58 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:24:55AM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
thus imposing performance penaltie
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:24:55AM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
> the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
> thus imposing performance penalties associated with the reduced number of
> trans
Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
thus imposing performance penalties associated with the reduced number of
transparent huge pages that could be used by the guest workload.
This patch
5 matches
Mail list logo
