Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

On 08/06/16 18:10, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 12:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg >> let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. > > dev_vdbg vs dev_dbg > > The patch subject and commit message don't match the code changes.

Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

On 08/06/16 18:10, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 12:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg >> let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. > > dev_vdbg vs dev_dbg > > The patch subject and commit message don't match the code changes.

Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 12:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg > let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. dev_vdbg vs dev_dbg The patch subject and commit message don't match the code changes. > diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c >

Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 12:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg > let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. dev_vdbg vs dev_dbg The patch subject and commit message don't match the code changes. > diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c >

[PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros Acked-by: Peter Chen --- drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

[PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()

Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages. Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros Acked-by: Peter Chen --- drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git