On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 06:46:29AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 10:02 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:49:47AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> If tracer modifies a syscall number to -1, this traced system call should
> >> be skipped with a return value speci
On 11/26/2014 10:02 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:49:47AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
If tracer modifies a syscall number to -1, this traced system call should
be skipped with a return value specified in x0.
This patch implements this semantics.
Please note:
* syscall entr
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:49:47AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> If tracer modifies a syscall number to -1, this traced system call should
> be skipped with a return value specified in x0.
> This patch implements this semantics.
>
> Please note:
> * syscall entry tracing and syscall exit tracing
If tracer modifies a syscall number to -1, this traced system call should
be skipped with a return value specified in x0.
This patch implements this semantics.
Please note:
* syscall entry tracing and syscall exit tracing (ftrace tracepoint and
audit) are always executed, if enabled, even when s
4 matches
Mail list logo