On 10/31/2012 09:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:24:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> Note both in the commit messages.
>>
>> I am sorry, but I can't find anything that may be related to this in the
>> commit messages. Can you be more specific ?
>
> Eh.. 'd', missing there.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:24:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Note both in the commit messages.
>
> I am sorry, but I can't find anything that may be related to this in the
> commit messages. Can you be more specific ?
Eh.. 'd', missing there. I meant that I noted both in the updated
commit
On 10/31/2012 09:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:49:33PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> The only think that drew my attention is that you are changing the
>> local_irq_save callsite to local_irq_disable. It shouldn't be a problem,
>> since this is never expected to
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:49:33PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> The only think that drew my attention is that you are changing the
> local_irq_save callsite to local_irq_disable. It shouldn't be a problem,
> since this is never expected to be called in interrupt context.
>
> Still... it m
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:31:34PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Thanks for this cleanup. The code looks much better now and:
> $ git diff --stat mmotm...tj-cgroups/review-cgroup-rmdir-updates
> block/blk-cgroup.c |3 +-
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 41 +---
> kernel/cgroup.c|
Thanks for this cleanup. The code looks much better now and:
$ git diff --stat mmotm...tj-cgroups/review-cgroup-rmdir-updates
block/blk-cgroup.c |3 +-
include/linux/cgroup.h | 41 +---
kernel/cgroup.c| 256
mm/hugetlb_cgroup.
On 10/31/2012 08:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> cgroup removal path is quite ugly. A lot of the ugliness comes from
> the weird design which allows ->pre_destroy() to fail and the feature
> to drain existing CSS reference counts before committing to removal.
> Both mean that it should
Hello, guys.
cgroup removal path is quite ugly. A lot of the ugliness comes from
the weird design which allows ->pre_destroy() to fail and the feature
to drain existing CSS reference counts before committing to removal.
Both mean that it should be possible to roll-back cgroup destruction
after so
8 matches
Mail list logo