On 2013/1/10 2:57, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:31:11AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> I don't think Paul's still maintaining cpusets. Normally it's Andrew
>> that picks up cpuset patches. It's fine you route it through cgroup
>> tree.
>
> Can you please take over the c
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
>
> I don't think Paul's still maintaining cpusets. Normally it's Andrew
> that picks up cpuset patches. It's fine you route it through cgroup
> tree.
Yes, I'm sorry - I should have handed on cpusets at the time I had to
hand on cgroups. I was only
Hello, Li.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:31:11AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I don't think Paul's still maintaining cpusets. Normally it's Andrew
> that picks up cpuset patches. It's fine you route it through cgroup
> tree.
Can you please take over the cpuset maintainership then? I think you
would be
On 01/04/2013 01:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Note that this leaves memcg as the only external user of cgroup_mutex.
> Michal, Kame, can you guys please convert memcg to use its own locking
> too?
I've already done this, I just have to rework it according to latest
feedback and repost it.
It should b
On 2013/1/8 0:44, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
>
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:27:00PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> I've reviewed and tested the patchset, and it looks good to me!
>>
>> Acked-by: Li Zefan
>
> Great. Ummm... How should we route this? Paul doesn't seem to be
> looking at this. I c
Hello, Li.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:27:00PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I've reviewed and tested the patchset, and it looks good to me!
>
> Acked-by: Li Zefan
Great. Ummm... How should we route this? Paul doesn't seem to be
looking at this. I can route it through cgroup tree. Any objections?
(2013/01/04 6:35), Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> This is the second attempt at decoupling cpuset locking from cgroup
> core. Changes from the last take[L] are
>
> * cpuset-drop-async_rebuild_sched_domains.patch moved from 0007 to
>0009. This reordering makes cpu hotplug handling async
On 2013/1/4 5:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> This is the second attempt at decoupling cpuset locking from cgroup
> core. Changes from the last take[L] are
>
> * cpuset-drop-async_rebuild_sched_domains.patch moved from 0007 to
> 0009. This reordering makes cpu hotplug handling async f
Hello, guys.
This is the second attempt at decoupling cpuset locking from cgroup
core. Changes from the last take[L] are
* cpuset-drop-async_rebuild_sched_domains.patch moved from 0007 to
0009. This reordering makes cpu hotplug handling async first and
removes the temporary cyclic locking d
9 matches
Mail list logo
