On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:28:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:16PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> > > This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
> > > kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:16PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> > This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
> > kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is different from
> > flush_kthread_work) is initializing a kthread
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
> kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is different from
> flush_kthread_work) is initializing a kthread_work and a completion on
> the stack, then queuing it and calling
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> kthread_worker was introduced together with concurrency managed
> workqueue to serve workqueue users which need a special dedicated
> worker - e.g. RT scheduling. This is minimal queue / flush / flush
> all iterface on top of kthread
Hello,
kthread_worker was introduced together with concurrency managed
workqueue to serve workqueue users which need a special dedicated
worker - e.g. RT scheduling. This is minimal queue / flush / flush
all iterface on top of kthread and each provided interface matches the
workqueue counterpart
5 matches
Mail list logo
