On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:11:28PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> > I am willing to believe I missed scenario when sorting, I just can't
> >> > think
> >> > of it (so I wouldn't know how to fix it). That's why I was looking for
> >> > an
> >> > example to make it more obvious to me. Sorry for
Hi Don,
On Wed, 7 May 2014 11:22:19 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:05:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >> Hi Don,
>> >>
>> >> On
Hi Don,
On Wed, 7 May 2014 11:22:19 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:05:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:11:28PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
I am willing to believe I missed scenario when sorting, I just can't
think
of it (so I wouldn't know how to fix it). That's why I was looking for
an
example to make it more obvious to me. Sorry for being slow..
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:05:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> Hi Don,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 29,
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:05:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM
Hi Jiri,
On Sun, 4 May 2014 19:53:34 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> * changes in v4:
>> - fix a tui navigation bug
>> - fix a bug in output change of perf diff
>> - move call to perf_hpp__init() out of
Hi Don,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >> >/*
>> >> >
Hi Don,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:55 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
/*
* Addresses with
Hi Jiri,
On Sun, 4 May 2014 19:53:34 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
* changes in v4:
- fix a tui navigation bug
- fix a bug in output change of perf diff
- move call to perf_hpp__init() out of setup_browser()
- fix
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
>
> * changes in v4:
> - fix a tui navigation bug
> - fix a bug in output change of perf diff
> - move call to perf_hpp__init() out of setup_browser()
> - fix alignment of some output fields on stdio
>
> * changes in
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
* changes in v4:
- fix a tui navigation bug
- fix a bug in output change of perf diff
- move call to perf_hpp__init() out of setup_browser()
- fix alignment of some output fields on stdio
* changes in v3:
-
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> >/*
> >> > * Addresses with no major/minor numbers are assumed to be
> >> >
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:38:10AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
/*
* Addresses with no major/minor numbers are assumed to be
* anonymous
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >/*
>> > * Addresses with no major/minor numbers are assumed to be
>> > * anonymous in userspace. Sort those on pid then address.
>> >
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Our orignal concept for the c2c tool was to sort hist entries into
> > cachelines, filter in only the HITMs and stores and re-sort based on
> > cachelines with the most weight.
> >
> > So using today's perf with a new search called
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Our orignal concept for the c2c tool was to sort hist entries into
cachelines, filter in only the HITMs and stores and re-sort based on
cachelines with the most weight.
So using today's perf with a new search called
Hi Don,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:27:35 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13:35AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
/*
* Addresses with no major/minor numbers are assumed to be
* anonymous in userspace. Sort those on pid then address.
*
*
Hi Don,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:46:42 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:00:15PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> > Hi Don,
>> >
>> > 2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
>> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:00:15PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > 2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:00:15PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus
Hi Don,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:46:42 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:00:15PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung
Hi Don,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hmm.. it seems that it's exactly sorted by the data symbol addresses, so
>> I don't see any problem here. What did you expect? If you want to see
>> those
Hi Don,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hmm.. it seems that it's exactly sorted by the data symbol addresses, so
I don't see any problem here. What did you expect? If you want to see
those symbol_daddr,pid
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> 2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > > ./perf mem record -a grep -r foo /* >
Hi Don,
2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > ./perf mem record -a grep -r foo /* > /dev/null
> > > ./perf mem report -F overhead,symbol_daddr,pid -s symbol_daddr,pid
Hi Don,
2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
./perf mem record -a grep -r foo /* /dev/null
./perf mem report -F overhead,symbol_daddr,pid -s symbol_daddr,pid
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
2014-04-23 (수), 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
./perf mem record -a grep -r foo /* /dev/null
./perf
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
> >>
Hi Don,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
>> field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
>> patchset [1].
>>
Hi Don,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
patchset [1].
The -F
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:15:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Don,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:16:47 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
field/column as Ingo
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
> field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
> patchset [1].
>
> The -F option can receive any sort keys that -s option recognize,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:05:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
patchset [1].
The -F option can receive any sort keys that -s option recognize, plus
Hello,
This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
patchset [1].
The -F option can receive any sort keys that -s option recognize, plus
following fields (name can be changed):
overhead, overhead_sys,
Hello,
This is a patchset implementing -F/--fields option to setup output
field/column as Ingo requested. It depends on my --percentage
patchset [1].
The -F option can receive any sort keys that -s option recognize, plus
following fields (name can be changed):
overhead, overhead_sys,
36 matches
Mail list logo
