Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v9)

2013-12-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Oleg, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:00:26 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 12/16, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> >> This patchset implements memory (address), stack[N], deference, >> bitfield, retval (it needs uretprobe tho) and file_offset fetch >> methods for uprobes. It's based on the previous work [1] do

Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v9)

2013-12-23 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 12/16, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > This patchset implements memory (address), stack[N], deference, > bitfield, retval (it needs uretprobe tho) and file_offset fetch > methods for uprobes. It's based on the previous work [1] done by > Hyeoncheol Lee. I can't say I understand every change in details

Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v9)

2013-12-22 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Steve, 2013-12-21 (토), 00:22 -0500, Steven Rostedt: > I applied all the patches and started testing and it failed to build, > with this error: > > > /home/rostedt/work/git/linux-trace.git/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c: In > function ‘kprobe_trace_self_tests_init’: > /home/rostedt/work/git/linu

[PATCHSET 00/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for more fetch methods (v9)

2013-12-15 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hello, This patchset implements memory (address), stack[N], deference, bitfield, retval (it needs uretprobe tho) and file_offset fetch methods for uprobes. It's based on the previous work [1] done by Hyeoncheol Lee. Now kprobes and uprobes have their own fetch_type_tables and, in turn, memory an