On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:14:50PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew, I think it's about ready and nobody seems to be against the
> proposed changes. Can you please take these into -mm?
>
> This v2 of this patchset. Changes from the last posting[1] are,
So, I've just tried to apply this patch to
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:31:07AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Andrew, ping?
>
> Ping #2. Workqueue conversion of writeback in the block tree needs
> these patches to avoid losing debug information over the conversion,
> so it'd be great if this can be scheduled for 3.10.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tej
* Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:31:07AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Andrew, ping?
>
> Ping #2. Workqueue conversion of writeback in the block tree needs
> these patches to avoid losing debug information over the conversion,
> so it'd be great if this can be scheduled for 3.10.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:31:07AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew, ping?
Ping #2. Workqueue conversion of writeback in the block tree needs
these patches to avoid losing debug information over the conversion,
so it'd be great if this can be scheduled for 3.10.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscr
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:14:50PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew, I think it's about ready and nobody seems to be against the
> proposed changes. Can you please take these into -mm?
Andrew, ping?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Hello,
Andrew, I think it's about ready and nobody seems to be against the
proposed changes. Can you please take these into -mm?
This v2 of this patchset. Changes from the last posting[1] are,
* CPU is now printed for both dump_stack() and show_regs() which s390
folks tell me should be enoug
6 matches
Mail list logo
