Hi,
Is nobody interested in those patches?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Gioh Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly.
> Following is my test case.
>
> mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc
> mda
Hi,
I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly.
Following is my test case.
mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc
mdadm /dev/md100 -a --failfast /dev/vdd
If I use failfast option, the vdd disk was faulty wrongly.
If not, it was spar
2 matches
Mail list logo