Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] regmap: Use different lockdep class for each regmap init call

2015-07-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:45:53PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > What's the status of this series (and the additional documentation > fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/8/385)? > Do we need acks from the mfd/vexpress and thermal maintainers? > (mfd/vexpress maintainers are Liviu Dudau, Sudeep Ho

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] regmap: Use different lockdep class for each regmap init call

2015-07-23 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:45:53AM +0100, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > Second version. Small fixup in the regmap patch itself [3/3] (the > > declaration of __devm_regmap_init_ac97 was missing lock_key/name > > parameters). > > >

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] regmap: Use different lockdep class for each regmap init call

2015-07-23 Thread Nicolas Boichat
Hi Mark, On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > Second version. Small fixup in the regmap patch itself [3/3] (the > declaration of __devm_regmap_init_ac97 was missing lock_key/name > parameters). > > Also, there are 2 drivers that are using function pointers named > "regmap_init

[PATCHv2 0/3] regmap: Use different lockdep class for each regmap init call

2015-07-07 Thread Nicolas Boichat
Second version. Small fixup in the regmap patch itself [3/3] (the declaration of __devm_regmap_init_ac97 was missing lock_key/name parameters). Also, there are 2 drivers that are using function pointers named "regmap_init", which causes problems as it is now a macro: put these in parentheses to pr