On 2014/5/16 22:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800,
On 2014/5/16 22:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >> On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/15 22:53,
On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800,
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >> On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/15 21:40,
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus
On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 15:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - now using
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >> On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>> - now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
>>> - NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
>>>
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Changes since v1:
> > - now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
> > - NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
> >
> > This combines two patch sets for LPSS that
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
> - NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
>
> This combines two patch sets for LPSS that I had already send for
> review separately. They conflicted with
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
- NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
This combines two patch sets for LPSS that I had already send for
review separately. They conflicted with each other.
The first two patches will fix a problem
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
- NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
This combines two patch sets for LPSS that I had already send for
review separately. They conflicted with each other.
The first two patches will fix a problem
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
- NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
This combines two patch sets for LPSS that I had already send for
review separately. They conflicted with each
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
- NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
This combines two patch sets for LPSS that I had
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
- NULL checks for clk_name allocation in acpi_lpss.c
This combines
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in clk_fd_recalc_rate() as suggested by Andy
-
On 2014/5/16 0:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:59:46PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 22:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:35 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/5/15 21:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Changes since v1:
- now using do_div() in
20 matches
Mail list logo
