On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 10:31 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > > I don't know
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 10:31 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > > I don't know
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31:31AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > > I
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31:31AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > > I
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:24:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yes, Grub as a matter of policy(!) does everything in the most braindead
> way possible. You have to use "linux16" or "linuxefi" to make it do
> something sane.
Good to know, thx.
> What is text mode? It is hardware that is
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:24:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yes, Grub as a matter of policy(!) does everything in the most braindead
> way possible. You have to use "linux16" or "linuxefi" to make it do
> something sane.
Good to know, thx.
> What is text mode? It is hardware that is
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
> >
> > no_longmode
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:48:51PM +, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> > I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
> >
> > no_longmode
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:24:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/29/17 14:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > A couple of points:
> >
> > * so this box here has a normal grub installation and apparently grub
> > jumps to some other entry point.
Ouch. Perhaps you can report this on
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:24:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/29/17 14:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > A couple of points:
> >
> > * so this box here has a normal grub installation and apparently grub
> > jumps to some other entry point.
Ouch. Perhaps you can report this on
On 11/29/17 14:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> A couple of points:
>
> * so this box here has a normal grub installation and apparently grub
> jumps to some other entry point.
>
Yes, Grub as a matter of policy(!) does everything in the most braindead
way possible. You have to use "linux16" or
On 11/29/17 14:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> A couple of points:
>
> * so this box here has a normal grub installation and apparently grub
> jumps to some other entry point.
>
Yes, Grub as a matter of policy(!) does everything in the most braindead
way possible. You have to use "linux16" or
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:33:28PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> You can't dump a message about *anything* if the bootloader bypasses the
> checks that happen before we leave the firmware behind. This is what
> this is about. For BIOS or EFI boot that go through the proper stub
> functions we
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:33:28PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> You can't dump a message about *anything* if the bootloader bypasses the
> checks that happen before we leave the firmware behind. This is what
> this is about. For BIOS or EFI boot that go through the proper stub
> functions we
On 11/29/17 11:19, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:01:35AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> We can hang the machine, or we can triple-fault it in the hope of
>> triggering a reset, and that way if the bootloader has been configured
>> with a backup kernel there is a hope of
On 11/29/17 11:19, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:01:35AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> We can hang the machine, or we can triple-fault it in the hope of
>> triggering a reset, and that way if the bootloader has been configured
>> with a backup kernel there is a hope of
On November 29, 2017 12:58:15 PM PST, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code --
>and
>> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>>
>> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for
On November 29, 2017 12:58:15 PM PST, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code --
>and
>> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>>
>> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for
>no_la57
>> case too?
>
>The
> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>
> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for no_la57
> case too?
The way to handle it is to check it early in the real mode boot code
> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>
> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for no_la57
> case too?
The way to handle it is to check it early in the real mode boot code
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:01:35AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We can hang the machine, or we can triple-fault it in the hope of
> triggering a reset, and that way if the bootloader has been configured
> with a backup kernel there is a hope of recovery.
Well, it triple-faults right now and
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:01:35AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We can hang the machine, or we can triple-fault it in the hope of
> triggering a reset, and that way if the bootloader has been configured
> with a backup kernel there is a hope of recovery.
Well, it triple-faults right now and
On 11/29/17 09:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
>> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>>
>> no_longmode handled by just hanging the
On 11/29/17 09:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
>> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>>
>> no_longmode handled by just hanging the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>
> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for no_la57
> case too?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>
> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for no_la57
> case too?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:40:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:40:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo,
> > >
> > > Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching
> > > between
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo,
> > >
> > > Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching
> > > between
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> > paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> > paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
> image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
> image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
> image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:06:41AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
> paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
> image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
Hi Ingo,
Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
I've updated patches based on your feedback.
Please review and consider
Hi Ingo,
Here's updated changes that prepare the code to boot-time switching between
paging modes and handle booting in 5-level mode when bootloader put kernel
image above 4G, but haven't enabled 5-level paging for us.
I've updated patches based on your feedback.
Please review and consider
38 matches
Mail list logo