On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:21:22PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I was waiting a new post because you mentioned something about some
> > people not being happy with this, something about a wonky BIOS failing
> > this on native.
>
> a
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:20:46PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 02:09:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > following up on [1], [2] and [3], this patchset adds update
> > > attribute groups to pmu, fact
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:20:46PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 02:09:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > following up on [1], [2] and [3], this patchset adds update
> > attribute groups to pmu, factors out the MSR probe code and
> > use it in msr,cstate* and rapl PMUs.
>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 02:09:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> following up on [1], [2] and [3], this patchset adds update
> attribute groups to pmu, factors out the MSR probe code and
> use it in msr,cstate* and rapl PMUs.
>
> The functionality stays the same with one exception:
> for msr PMU
hi,
following up on [1], [2] and [3], this patchset adds update
attribute groups to pmu, factors out the MSR probe code and
use it in msr,cstate* and rapl PMUs.
The functionality stays the same with one exception:
for msr PMU: the event is not exported if the rdmsr return zero
on event's msr, csta
5 matches
Mail list logo
