On 27/10/15 16:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
>> Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
>> defining entirely new generic bindings (the
On 27/10/15 16:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
>> Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
>>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There are other problems though, but I comment on these
> separately.
Was wrong about that. I think this can go in like this.
Later, this device may fork off a GPIO chip as well, but
we will deal with that whenever we run into it.
Yours,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
> Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
> defining entirely new generic bindings (the channel modes stuff)
> I would like some more
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
> Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
> defining entirely new generic bindings (the
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There are other problems though, but I comment on these
> separately.
Was wrong about that. I think this can go in like this.
Later, this device may fork off a GPIO chip as well, but
we will deal with that
On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
defining entirely new generic bindings (the channel modes stuff)
I would like some more input. It might be overkill but we do
of course have the pinctl
On 13/10/15 10:37, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
Looks good to me, but as it is a little bit 'different' and we are
defining entirely new generic bindings (the channel modes stuff)
I would like some more input. It might be overkill but we do
of
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
---
.../devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ad5592r.txt| 43 ++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ad5592r.txt
v2: Fix indentation issue
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
---
.../devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ad5592r.txt| 43 ++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ad5592r.txt
v2: Fix indentation issue
diff --git
10 matches
Mail list logo