On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 13:16 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:48:15AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on
> > v4.9
> > stable.
> >
> > And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for
On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 13:16 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:48:15AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on
> > v4.9
> > stable.
> >
> > And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:48:15AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on v4.9
> stable.
>
> And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for line discipline changing
> code, verifying that write ldisc sem will be held
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:48:15AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on v4.9
> stable.
>
> And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for line discipline changing
> code, verifying that write ldisc sem will be held
Hi all,
Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on v4.9
stable.
And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for line discipline changing
code, verifying that write ldisc sem will be held forthwith.
The last patch is optional and probably, timeout can be dropped for
Hi all,
Three fixes that worth to have in the @stable, as we've hit them on v4.9
stable.
And for linux-next - adding lockdep asserts for line discipline changing
code, verifying that write ldisc sem will be held forthwith.
The last patch is optional and probably, timeout can be dropped for
6 matches
Mail list logo