Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns

2014-09-23 Thread Andy Grover
On 09/18/2014 04:17 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: I'm currently reviewing #2, #4, #5 and #7 and will consider merging these. These cleanups account for most of the LOC reduction, and avoid most of the larger concerns. Also for patches like this, they really need testing on your end before I

Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns

2014-09-18 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 15:54 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > On 09/18/2014 12:38 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 21:55 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> ping again. We're getting closer to the end of the 3.18 merge window > >> and there still hasn't been a response. Shoul

Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns

2014-09-18 Thread Andy Grover
On 09/18/2014 12:38 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 21:55 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: ping again. We're getting closer to the end of the 3.18 merge window and there still hasn't been a response. Should Andy just send the patches directly to Linus once 3.18 opens give

Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns

2014-09-18 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 21:55 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:15:11PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Nic, > > > > any progress on looking over these? Seems like there's actually > > nothing at all queued up for 3.17 in the target tree, or am І missing > > something

Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns

2014-09-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:15:11PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Nic, > > any progress on looking over these? Seems like there's actually > nothing at all queued up for 3.17 in the target tree, or am І missing > something? ping again. We're getting closer to the end of the 3.18 merge window