Em Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:01:00PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:39:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:39:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:39:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at
Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:59:58AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke escreveu:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:48AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > > this patchset is
Em Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > >
> > > SNIP
> > >
> > >> This is with your
On 7/25/20 5:21 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:22:28AM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>The change looks good to me. I tried with adding this patch on top of
>> your perf/metric branch. It did resolve the issue of not printing
>> all chips data.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:59:58AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:48AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > > this patchset is
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:22:28AM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
SNIP
>
> Hi Jiri,
>The change looks good to me. I tried with adding this patch on top of
> your perf/metric branch. It did resolve the issue of not printing
> all chips data. And now I can see proper values for hv-24x7 metric
On 7/21/20 12:46 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>>>
>>> SNIP
>>>
This is with your perf/metric branch:
command# ./perf stat
> perf: util/evsel.c:1452: get_group_fd: Assertion `!(!leader->core.fd)'
> failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
> ```
This usually happens when you run out of file descriptors
-Andi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:48AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> > > another metric.
> > >
> > > For
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:48AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> > > another metric.
> > >
> > > For
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:48:48AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> > another metric.
> >
> > For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
> >
> > {
>
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> another metric.
>
> For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
>
> {
> "BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical Processor)",
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>
>
> On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >> This is with your perf/metric branch:
> >> command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
> >>
On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> This is with your perf/metric branch:
>> command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
>> assertion failed at util/metricgroup.c:709
>> # time counts
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
SNIP
> This is with your perf/metric branch:
> command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
> assertion failed at util/metricgroup.c:709
> # time counts unit events
> 1.54545 7,807,505
On 7/20/20 12:52 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:14:00PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/20 11:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
>>> another metric.
>>>
>>> For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:14:00PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/20 11:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> > another metric.
> >
> > For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
> >
> > {
> >
On 7/19/20 11:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> another metric.
>
> For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
>
> {
> "BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical Processor)",
> -
hi,
this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
another metric.
For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
{
"BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical Processor)",
-"MetricExpr": "INST_RETIRED.ANY / CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD",
+
21 matches
Mail list logo
