Re: [PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

Ingo Molnar wrote: > cool patchset. Small nit, the series is not bisectable: Yeah, in a few places. Uli, this is super easy to test if you maintain the patches with guilt. With some easy scripting around guilt push you can verify that the series builds as each patch is applied. - z - To

Re: [PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

Ingo Molnar wrote: cool patchset. Small nit, the series is not bisectable: Yeah, in a few places. Uli, this is super easy to test if you maintain the patches with guilt. With some easy scripting around guilt push you can verify that the series builds as each patch is applied. - z - To

Re: [PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

cool patchset. Small nit, the series is not bisectable: > +#include > --- kernel/Makefile > +++ kernel/Makefile > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o printk.o > profile.o \ > rcupdate.o extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \ > kthread.o wait.o

[PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

This is the actual architecture-independent part of the system call implementation. include/linux/indirect.h |6 ++ include/linux/sched.h|4 include/linux/syscalls.h |4 kernel/Makefile |2 +- kernel/indirect.c| 36

Re: [PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

cool patchset. Small nit, the series is not bisectable: +#include asm/indirect.h --- kernel/Makefile +++ kernel/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o printk.o profile.o \ rcupdate.o extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \ kthread.o

[PATCHv4 1/6] actual sys_indirect code

This is the actual architecture-independent part of the system call implementation. include/linux/indirect.h |6 ++ include/linux/sched.h|4 include/linux/syscalls.h |4 kernel/Makefile |2 +- kernel/indirect.c| 36