Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] bridge: multicast snooping patches / exports

2014-06-11 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:26:25 +0200 > The first patch is simply a cosmetic patch. So far I (and maybe others > too?) have been regularly confusing these two structs, therefore I'd > suggest renaming them and therefore making the follow-up patches easier > to understand and

Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] bridge: multicast snooping patches / exports

2014-06-11 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing linus.luess...@web.de Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:26:25 +0200 The first patch is simply a cosmetic patch. So far I (and maybe others too?) have been regularly confusing these two structs, therefore I'd suggest renaming them and therefore making the follow-up patches easier

[PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] bridge: multicast snooping patches / exports

2014-06-07 Thread Linus Lüssing
The first patch is simply a cosmetic patch. So far I (and maybe others too?) have been regularly confusing these two structs, therefore I'd suggest renaming them and therefore making the follow-up patches easier to understand and nicer to fit in. The second patch fixes a minor issue, but probably

[PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] bridge: multicast snooping patches / exports

2014-06-07 Thread Linus Lüssing
The first patch is simply a cosmetic patch. So far I (and maybe others too?) have been regularly confusing these two structs, therefore I'd suggest renaming them and therefore making the follow-up patches easier to understand and nicer to fit in. The second patch fixes a minor issue, but probably