On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:35:58PM +, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 12:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > It seems more that IOMMU attachment is closer to being a property of the
> > bus rather than a property of the device itself. In that context it
> > would make more sense for the bus
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:35:58PM +, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/22/2013 12:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
It seems more that IOMMU attachment is closer to being a property of the
bus rather than a property of the device itself. In that context it
would make more sense for the bus device
On 11/22/2013 12:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:04:18 -0700, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
>> On 11/21/2013 06:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:06 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
IOMMU devices on the bus need to be poplulated first, then iommu
master
On 11/22/2013 12:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:04:18 -0700, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/21/2013 06:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:06 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
IOMMU devices on the bus need to be poplulated
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:04:18 -0700, Stephen Warren
wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 06:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:06 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> >> IOMMU devices on the bus need to be poplulated first, then iommu
> >> master devices are done later.
> >>
> >> With
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:04:18 -0700, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/21/2013 06:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:06 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
IOMMU devices on the bus need to be poplulated first, then iommu
master devices are done
On 11/20/2013 07:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Thierry Reding wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
> +0100:
(Yes, what Thierry said)
>
>>> Does the above mean the following?
>>>
>>> int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> struct of_phandle_args args;
>>>
>>>
Thierry Reding wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
+0100:
> > Does the above mean the following?
> >
> > int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > int i;
> > struct of_phandle_args args;
> >
> > of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "iommus",
> >
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:17:08AM +0100, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:22:47
> +0100:
>
> > On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > > Hi Thierry,
> > >
> > > Thierry Reding wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013
> > > 11:25:07 +0100:
> > >
> > >> From earlier
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:17:08AM +0100, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:22:47
+0100:
On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013
11:25:07 +0100:
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
+0100:
Does the above mean the following?
int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
{
int i;
struct of_phandle_args args;
of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(dev-of_node, iommus,
On 11/20/2013 07:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
+0100:
(Yes, what Thierry said)
Does the above mean the following?
int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
{
int i;
struct of_phandle_args args;
Stephen Warren wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:22:47 +0100:
> On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > Thierry Reding wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:25:07
> > +0100:
> >
> >> From earlier discussions I thought the goal was to actually defer this
> >> until all nodes
On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Thierry Reding wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:25:07
> +0100:
>
>> From earlier discussions I thought the goal was to actually defer this
>> until all nodes referred to by the iommus property were actually
>> registered. The above only
On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:25:07
+0100:
From earlier discussions I thought the goal was to actually defer this
until all nodes referred to by the iommus property were actually
registered.
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:22:47 +0100:
On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:25:07
+0100:
From earlier discussions I thought the goal was to actually defer
16 matches
Mail list logo