Re: [PATCHv7 15/33] posix-timers: Make clock_nanosleep() time namespace aware

2019-10-14 Thread Andrey Vagin
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 9:28 PM kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > [cannot apply to v5.4-rc2 next-20191011] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help >

Re: [PATCHv7 15/33] posix-timers: Make clock_nanosleep() time namespace aware

2019-10-13 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dmitry, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc2 next-20191011] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify

Re: [PATCHv7 15/33] posix-timers: Make clock_nanosleep() time namespace aware

2019-10-13 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dmitry, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [cannot apply to v5.4-rc2 next-20191011] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify

[PATCHv7 15/33] posix-timers: Make clock_nanosleep() time namespace aware

2019-10-10 Thread Dmitry Safonov
From: Andrei Vagin clock_nanosleep() accepts absolute values of expiration time, if the TIMER_ABSTIME flag is set. This value is in the task time namespace, which has to be converted to the host time namespace. Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov Signed-off-by: Dmitry