On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:44:12AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:05:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
>
> I have not given it much consideration, but IIRC, the other arches that
> were using reboot= were only looking
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:44:12AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:05:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
I have not given it much consideration, but IIRC, the other arches that
were using reboot= were only looking for
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:05:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
I have not given it much consideration, but IIRC, the other arches that
were using reboot= were only looking for an 'h' or something like that.
I will consider making the syntax
Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
Robin Holt wrote:
>Moving the reboot=s<##> parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
>proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
>reboot cpu.
>
>I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
>takes
Moving the reboot=s<##> parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
reboot cpu.
I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
takes precedence. I also fixed up the current code to support
up to cpuid's up to the current
Moving the reboot=s## parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
reboot cpu.
I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
takes precedence. I also fixed up the current code to support
up to cpuid's up to the current
Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
Robin Holt h...@sgi.com wrote:
Moving the reboot=s## parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
reboot cpu.
I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
takes
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:05:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Why not just support the existing syntax everywhere?
I have not given it much consideration, but IIRC, the other arches that
were using reboot= were only looking for an 'h' or something like that.
I will consider making the syntax
8 matches
Mail list logo