On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
>
> I will move this code to the mcryptd.c.
>
> About the naming scheme, could you give me an example where the internal
> and external algorithm have the same name? I tried searching but did not
> find any.
>
> When the outer and inner a
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 17:00 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:50:34PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> >
> > +static int simd_skcipher_decrypt_mb(struct skcipher_request *req)
> > +{
> > + struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req);
> > + struct simd_skcipher_ctx_mb
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:50:34PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
>
> +static int simd_skcipher_decrypt_mb(struct skcipher_request *req)
> +{
> + struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req);
> + struct simd_skcipher_ctx_mb *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
> + struct skcipher_requ
Hi Megha,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20170420]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc7]
[cannot apply to crypto/master sparc-next/master v4.9-rc8 v4.9-rc7 v4.9-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day
Hi Megha,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20170420]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc7]
[cannot apply to crypto/master sparc-next/master v4.9-rc8 v4.9-rc7 v4.9-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day
In this patch, the infrastructure needed to support multibuffer
encryption implementation is added:
a) Enhance mcryptd daemon to support skcipher requests.
b) Add multi-buffer simd skcipher helper which presents the
top-level algorithm as an skcipher.
b) Update configuration to include multi-
6 matches
Mail list logo
