On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/8/20 17:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>When converting to hierarchical irqdomain, the IOAPIC
> >> internal and interfaces have changed much, and seems no easy
> >> way to revert cd68f6bd53cf. There may be
On 2015/8/20 17:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/8/19 16:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Well, the regressio
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/8/19 16:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>> On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, the regression at hand has just shown that the assertion in t
On 2015/8/19 16:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, the regression at hand has just shown that the assertion in the
changelog of that commit ("no need for f
On 2015/8/19 16:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, the regression at hand has just shown that the assertion in the
changelog of that commit ("no need for f
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Well, the regression at hand has just shown that the assertion in the
> > > changelog of that commit ("no need for for special treatment for GSI
> > > used by A
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, the regression at hand has just shown that the assertion in the
> > changelog of that commit ("no need for for special treatment for GSI
> > used by ACPI SCI") does not really hold. So, if the only motiv
On 2015/8/19 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/8/19 14:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jiang Liu
>>> wrote:
Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
After re
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/8/19 14:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
>>> After rebooting the VM, the following messages are logged in syslog
>>
On 2015/8/19 14:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
>> After rebooting the VM, the following messages are logged in syslog
>> when trying to load the tulip driver:
>> tulip: Linux T
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
> After rebooting the VM, the following messages are logged in syslog
> when trying to load the tulip driver:
> tulip: Linux Tulip drivers version 1.1.15 (Feb 27, 2007)
> tulip:
Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
After rebooting the VM, the following messages are logged in syslog
when trying to load the tulip driver:
tulip: Linux Tulip drivers version 1.1.15 (Feb 27, 2007)
tulip: :00:0a.0: PCI INT A: failed to register GSI
tulip: Cannot
12 matches
Mail list logo
